Skip to main content

Is India's new trade rule to hurt China?




The Indian government has made a    significant change in its trade rules on Thursday.

 According to the new rules, companies bidding in India for government purchases will be able to do this only if they are registered in the Registration Committee of
DPIIT
 Apart from this, it will be necessary to take political and security approval from the Ministry of External Affairs and Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India.  The central government has given instructions to all the state governments that they should also implement this rule in all their government purchases.  Under this rule, the Ministry of Finance has also given some exemptions.
Due to covid-19 epidemic, exemption has been given till December 31 for the purchase of goods related to Kovid.  These changes have been made by the Government of India in the General Financial Rules, 2017.

 This will apply to those countries which share border with India and participate in government purchases.  According to experts, China has not been said anywhere in this change, but this decision will have the most impact on trade with India's neighbor China.
 Impact on china
 Talking about the statistics, in 2019-20, India imported 65.26 billion dollars from China.  Whereas China imports only 16.6 billion dollars from India.  There is no separate data available about how much government purchase is there.  These figures have been released by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade of India.

 It is so clear from these figures that there was a trade deficit of $ 48.66 billion between the two countries.  That is, we import more goods from China and in comparison to that, China buys very few things from us.  In the last four to five years, these figures have been around the same.

 So will this step of India break the back of China's economy?  According to Gautam Chikramane, Vice President at the Observer Research Foundation, India has taken this step for its safety.  This will not have much impact on China's economy, because the US and European Union are more important for China from the point of view of business strategy.

 Gautam Chikarmane is known to know about economic policies in India and internationally.
 The government of India in its order has also described this step as a decision in terms of defense and national security.  In the last few days, other countries of the world have also made many serious allegations like stealing data and spying on a Chinese company, which has always been rejected by China.  The same reasoning was also given by the central government behind banning 59 apps.

 If Gautam believes, then India is sending a message that China is in great danger for India's security.  Such a country, which is clearly expressing its enmity with India, supports Pakistan.  With which there is tension on the border, India cannot open the door for that country and welcome it.

 It is in this context that the change of this new business rules needs to be seen.

 Then what will India achieve?  In response to this question, Gautam says that this is part of a strategy which is called 'de-coupling'.  Today, a campaign has been launched in the whole world to do 'de-coupling' with China.

 America, Britain and Australia are also involved in this now.  India is also a part of that.  But to assume that just stopping India will make a big difference to China, it is absolutely wrong.  But with such a step of India, a moral pressure is created on other countries of the world, and they too can take steps in this direction.

 Gautam also argues for his statement.  Recently, India banned Chinese apps.  Now talked about banning tick-talk in America too.  From India, 5G and other government projects started an exercise to show the exit to Chinese companies, then Britain and America also talked about banning Khwave.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Joginder Nath Mandal: Pakistan is 'traitor' in the country and India's 'infallible'

 The rise and spread of religious fanaticism in Pakistan is attributed to the parallel power of the government of former military dictator General Zia-ul-Haq and subsequent established clerics.   But a special figure in history, Joginder Nath Mandal, in the resignation of the then Prime Minister 70 years ago, used Pakistan’s policy of establishing power as a weapon to promote religious bigotry and then kneel before it.  Was held responsible   Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the founder of Pakistan, invited Joginder Nath Mandal to chair the first session of the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan.  He also became the first law minister of Pakistan.    Prior to the partition of India, not only was independence from the British colonial system an important issue in Bengal politics, but in the eyes of some, the peasants in the landlord system of Bengal were even more important.  Most of them were Muslims.  Behind him were Dalits, also known as Namasudras....

Domino's pizza Update for you .

Domino's Pizza has dropped a promotion offering free pizza to a woman named Karen after receiving a response.   In recent years, the name "Karen" has been used as an insult to white middle-aged women who are considered abusive or racist.   The New Zealand arm of the pizza franchise initially said it wanted to take a break from the negativity of "nice carnations".   But some said he is tone-deaf, ignoring more important issues and "gaining privileges."   What was the offer?   The pizza chain's Australian, Australian and New Zealand pages were titled "King Ling All (Karens)".   It asked people named Karen to tell Domino’s in 250 words how they are one of the “nice people”.   "The name 'Karen' has become synonymous with anyone who is entitled, selfish and chooses to complain," said Lon Collins, Domino's chief marketing officer in the field.   “It was a light-hearted souvenir, it really became an insu...

Hathras case: Did the Yogi government decide the CBI probe under damage control?

 Protests are taking place across the country in the alleged case of gangrape in Hathras, Uttar Pradesh and political parties are flocking to the victim's village, while the state government, due to its many decisions, has also raised several new controversies.   Although the state government has ordered a CBI probe, the aggrieved party has also ordered a narco test.  The victim's family is surprised by the decision to conduct their own narco test, instead of the CBI, they are adamant on a judicial inquiry.   With the CBI probe order, Yogi Adityanath said, "For the purpose of thorough investigation into the unfortunate incident at Hathras and all the issues related to it, the Uttar Pradesh government is recommending an inquiry into the case by the Central Bureau of Investigation.  We are committed to it. "   Earlier, he had said, "In Uttar Pradesh, the idea of ​​harming the dignity and self-esteem of mothers and sisters is bound to destroy the people. They ...